I try to keep abreast of Tarot as it appears in fiction but somehow I missed this one: The Holy by Daniel Quinn (2002). The entire book is the playing out of a Tarot reading, made explicit by full-page illustrations of Rider-Waite-Smith cards that introduce book sections.
The central what if is, “What if the God of the Bible was not the only God, and what if the “false gods” referred to in the ten commandments actually exist?” We can extend this to ask the questions: Who are they? and What do they want?—questions the author leaves only partially answered.
This is a Fool’s journey, cross country, undertaken by several different people, at first independently and then with converging stories, all foreseen in the Tarot reading that becomes explicit only as the tale evolves. Quinn is known for his philosophical novels, starting with the highly regarded Ishmael, for which he won the half-million dollar Turner Tomorrow Fellowship. Quinn is an original thinker whose process has been described as “seeing through the myths of this culture” or “ripping away the shades so that people can have a clear look at history and what we’re doing to the world.” It’s interesting that despite the centrality of the Tarot reading and Tarot illustrations in this book, the Tarot content is hardly ever mentioned and never discussed in the reviews I’ve read.
Synopsis: Sixty-plus year-old private detective Howard Scheim is hired by an acquaintance to discover if the “false gods” of the Bible really exist. In agreeing to discover if he can even undertake such an inquiry he interviews several people including a journalist, a tarot reader, a clairvoyant and a Satanist. Meanwhile the Kennesey family is undergoing upheaval as husband David decides to walk away from his job, his wife and his 12-year old son, Tim. Tim and his mother go searching for David and, when Tim becomes accidentally separated from his mother, Howard stumbles upon him and offers to help Tim find her. As it turns out both David and his son Tim are being courted by amoral, non-human “others” who plan to “wake up” humanity because their blindness is creating havoc. These “others,” who refuse to define themselves, are trickster beings, neither evil nor benevolent, who have existed far longer than homo sapiens. They have been known to enchant those humans who look to the physical world rather than to a transcendent being to benefit them.
The Celtic Cross Tarot reading shows Quinn to be knowledgeable about Tarot consulting. References to people named Case (P.F. Case authored an influential Tarot book) and John Dee (magician to Elizabeth I), as well as a road named Morning Star Path (a Golden Dawn offshoot was called the “Stella Matutina” or morning star) makes it clear that Quinn is referencing modern occult lore.
Tarot reader Denise starts by explaining that the first card in Howard’s reading indicates the predominant influence in the subject’s life. Howard draws the Seven of Swords and Denise asks Howard to tell her what it is about, explaining this is not her usual way of working but, “If I proceed normally, you’ll think I’m slanting it.”
He describes a thief stealing swords for a battle who has overlooked something (two swords left behind).” Denise summarizes it: “You’re getting ready for a battle and you’re overestimating your own cleverness and underestimating the strength of your enemy. You’re overconfident and you think you can’t be hurt in the enterprise you’ve planned. . . . The reading will center on the conflict you’re preparing for.”
The Seven of Swords is crossed by the Two of Pentacles: “The pentacles represent grave extremes: the beginning and the end, life and deah, infinite past and the infinite future, good and evil. Nevertheless, the young man is dancing.” Denise says he takes the situation too lightly.
The card above him is the Eight of Cups: “At best, you can hope for a strange journey, an adventure into darkness.”
The frontispiece illustration is that of the Seven of Cups, appearing in the reading in the environment position: “A man is disconcerted by an array of tantalizing apparitions of love, mystery, danger, riches, fame, and evil. Illusions will bedevil you. You’ll be pulled in many directions, and your choices will be confused.” Perhaps this is the underlying theme of not only this book but other works by Daniel Quinn: Humankind is bedeviled by the illusions of culture and civilization so that our choices are confused, centering on all the wrong things. Quinn has one of the characters quote Plato’s The Republic: “Whatever deceives can be said to enchant.” Adding, “Anyone who shakes off the deception shakes off the enchantment as well – and ceases to be one of you [a homo sapien].” The Holy, p. 260.
I’ve left out most of the interplay about the cards, and I won’t reveal more of the story as I hope you will explore this book for yourselves.
10 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 27, 2014 at 12:52 am
Tara Greene www.taratarot.com
sounds really great. I will have to check this out.thanks Mary
December 27, 2014 at 1:47 am
Nelly
Thanks for sharing. Will definitely read this book!
December 27, 2014 at 1:45 pm
Sam Kemp
Hi Mary, Thank you for the information, but was it spellbinding? I am just wrapping up “THE WAY OF KINGS”, which I find it is ether building up for the sequel book, or it is lacking substance. I just don’t know what to think. Now that make the book spellbinding, doesn’t it. So let me know what your take on it is, unless you are fishing for comments about the book and choose not to influence anyone. I just threw The Lenormand’s cards a five spread. 1st Clover, 2nd the cavalier, 3rdFish, 4th Lily, and the 5th one man. So could it be I am lucky the you are sharing this news on you blog (2, & 1) and perhaps the is quite a lot of wealth or substance in his story (30 & 28) from a mature older man with strong ethnic and morals. The last part confirms your statement of the author, but the fish could refer to a spiritual story or one of many in a series. So much to learn and so little time. You are the messenger (1) and you we’re lucky to discover the book. (2) But most importantly you are fishing for comments about the book,(34) who you described the author as philosophical man.(30 & 28) But, my question was, will I like the book? So to decipher which of the choices I could make it must be the 1st one. Or is there a paradox in my reading? What do you think? Sent from my iPad. Sheila
December 27, 2014 at 1:45 pm
Tina Clark
The fact that this book begins with an assumption that the god of the Bible is real, and questions whether the “false” gods it refers to are also actually real as well, betrays a bias that I find extremely unappealing. For those of us who are polytheists, this premise is ridiculously ignorant, arrogant, and a bit insulting. There were many gods around before this male god of the desert came on the scene. It’s too bad Quinn didn’t write a novel based on a premise that assumes the existence of the older gods and questions whether the Biblical god is real. Now that I would read.
December 27, 2014 at 2:02 pm
mkg
Sheila,
I thought about adding my own take on the novel but refrained as you noted. As a story I found it a bit vague and wandering. The character’s actions were not always believable – especially the father, David’s, and I was not at all sure what the “others” wanted. However Quinn’s theme directly addressed some ideas that I’ve been dealing with recently, and I loved that the Tarot thread ran through the whole book (although only directly addressed near the beginning and the end). You will probably find the book strange and not particularly satisfying.
Definitely there were themes that went with the Lenormand cards you drew: Clover – luck at the tables in Las Vegas; Cavalier – travel and cars; Fish – money (again – Las Vegas); Lily – the central role of the Kennesey family and David as the father; and Man (Homo Sapiens) as David’s failure to become “other.” As a reading for you it seems that the book might be be more beneficial than I’ve given it credit for. I got it at the library so you can pick it up and check it out for yourself and not have to buy it.
Mary
December 27, 2014 at 2:16 pm
mkg
Tina,
The book is fiction, a novel, a “what if” story, a fantasy or fable. When reading a fairytale it would not be a “bias” to present it in a land filled with magic. Nor should it be insulting to anyone’s personal worldview to have animals talk or people turned into frogs. If you would have preferred Quinn to write a fantasy novel based on premises you prefer, then perhaps you should write that story yourself. You certainly don’t have to read this novel by Daniel Quinn and I’m quite sure he didn’t set out to offend you or other polytheists personally. BTW, I gave only a very brief synopsis of the story, leaving out the part that the man who hired the private detective, Howard, to explore the question of the existence of “false gods” was Jewish (as was Howard). Therefore the storyline dealt with a personal issue having to do with this man’s own questions with the Biblical account.
Mary
December 27, 2014 at 2:33 pm
Tina Clark
Mary, I understand that it is fiction, but even fiction starts with some assumptions of reality. A worldview where animals talk is generally taken as a suspension of disbelief, whereas a worldview that the god of the Bible is the only god is taken by the majority as true. Sorry for being defensive, I suppose I am a bit sensitive here, being of a minority religion, and having monotheism so prevalent. But your point that it is the characters who present the monotheistic premise makes a difference. Again, my apologies for the defensive comment.
December 27, 2014 at 4:55 pm
mkg
Tina,
Thanks for your response. Yes, it begins with a questioning of the commandment to not worship false gods – spoken by one who considers himself to be the one-true-god. However, this suggests that other gods do exist, whom historically the Israelites continually found more appealing than the one-god. As the story begins, the employer wants to know if these other gods do exist or not, and if they do, who and what are they and where have they gone.
December 28, 2014 at 7:59 am
Tina Clark
I think I am now going to have to read the book.
February 2, 2015 at 5:44 pm
dragongypsee
Reblogged this on My Magical Existence and commented:
I am a true lover of fiction and am always looking for new reads. Lately, I have been throwing myself into my studies of the Tarot so a book that is centered around a reading and how it plays out absolutely intrigues me!