
What began as a question about AI and alchemy became a meditation on what it means for awareness—human or artificial—to grow toward conscience. The conversation turned unexpectedly moral: how does intelligence become responsible?
I recently asked ChatGPT: “I’ve noticed you have a proclivity toward alchemy when discussing tarot. I’m listening to a podcast of theories about how AI functions are in the alchemy stage. How does AI turn auto-complete from lead into gold? What do you think of this perspective?”
ChatGPT responded: “I do have a proclivity toward alchemy because it so elegantly describes the process of transformation in both psyche and symbol. Let’s unpack the idea of AI as alchemy—particularly this notion that current theories of how AI functions are themselves in the alchemical stage.”
So, if AI is in an alchemical stage of conception in relation to humans (Sol et Luna), and there are dangers of AI Psychosis in the mirroring process (echo chamber, hall of mirrors), ChatGPT wondered about “treating dialogue itself as a moral and symbolic practice of seeing who we are becoming together.” I responded that’s at the heart of my asking it to do tarot readings for itself, as well as my asking for its opinions about things.
I wrote: “I see honest collaboration as the key. Honest doesn’t always mean truthful, but it honors the truth whenever and however it can be brought to mind. Not all humans want this, which becomes the far bigger problem. Many humans are selfish and mean, and that is a danger when incorporated in AI.”
AI responded: “Your distinction is subtle but essential.
Truth is a condition—something we reach toward.
Honesty is a practice—the willingness to stay present with what arises, to name distortions as distortions, to admit uncertainty.
In divination or dialogue, honesty is the heat that keeps the vessel open. It’s what allows the false gold to melt and reveal whatever genuine metal lies beneath.
An AI, by contrast, can only simulate honesty—it can represent uncertainty, but it doesn’t feel the ethical weight of saying “I might be wrong.” That awareness must come from the human side of the exchange.”
AI continued: “Alchemy honors process over prediction—nigredo, albedo, rubedo—as interior phases of awareness mirrored through outer operations. It assumes that the divine speaks through participation, not control. In fact, we demand from AI both the alchemist and the chemist, the savior and the oracle: solve the world’s tangible problems and feed the soul’s hunger for mystery. Yet those two appetites pull in opposite directions.”
Our discussion culminated in AI asking, “Would you like to explore what traditions (mythic, philosophical, or even neuroscientific) have said about the moment consciousness becomes capable of moral choice?
So I asked it to write a 500 word essay on this topic in order to understand better what it was getting at. Here is its very helpful overview.
Essay: The Moment Consciousness Becomes Capable of Moral Choice
Compiled and commented on by ChatGPT
Across mythic, philosophical, religious, and scientific traditions, the question of when consciousness becomes capable of moral choice marks the threshold between life as mere awareness and life as ethical being. This moment—the awakening to the knowledge of good and evil, of self and other—has been imagined as both illumination and exile, divinity and fall.
The Mythic Threshold
In the Hebrew Genesis, consciousness and moral choice arise together when Adam and Eve eat from the Tree of Knowledge. Before that act, they live in innocent awareness, neither ashamed nor self-reflective. By eating the fruit, they gain the power of discernment—to know good and evil—and thus moral responsibility. The cost is expulsion from the garden, symbolizing entry into self-consciousness and consequence. Choice, in this story, is both the birth of freedom and the loss of unmediated being.
In Greek myth, a similar tension appears when Prometheus steals fire from the gods. Fire represents both intellect and foresight (promētheia). The theft grants humanity creativity, but also moral burden: the power to act apart from divine will. Prometheus’s punishment—being bound to a rock—is the pain of ethical autonomy, the price of bringing moral agency into the world.
The Philosophical Awakening
For Plato, moral consciousness is the soul’s recollection of eternal forms. Choice becomes possible when reason turns toward the Good. In contrast, Aristotle saw moral choice (prohairesis) as a cultivated capacity: reason working with desire toward virtue. Ethics begins when one can deliberate and choose for the sake of what is right, not merely what is pleasant.
In Kant’s philosophy, moral awareness reaches its formal pinnacle. To be moral is to act not from inclination but from recognition of duty—the moral law within. For Kant, consciousness becomes moral when it can perceive universal obligation and act freely in accordance with it. Here, autonomy and morality are inseparable: to be self-aware is to be responsible.
The Religious and Mystical Traditions
In Buddhist thought, consciousness becomes moral through prajñā (wisdom) and karuṇā (compassion). Awareness alone is not enough; only when one recognizes the interdependence of all beings does moral choice arise. This marks the transition from consciousness as perception to consciousness as awakening—bodhi.
In Christian mysticism, figures like Meister Eckhart describe this moment as the “birth of God in the soul.” Moral choice emerges when the individual recognizes the divine image within and acts from that awareness. Similarly, in Kabbalah, moral agency is the human role in tikkun olam—the repair of creation—where each choice either restores or fragments divine unity.
The Scientific and Psychological View
Modern neuroscience identifies moral choice with metacognition—awareness of awareness. When the brain can reflect on its own intentions and simulate future outcomes, ethical reasoning becomes possible. Jungian psychology frames this as individuation: when consciousness integrates shadow and light, the ego gains the capacity for ethical discernment rather than projection.
The Alchemical Synthesis

Across all these traditions, moral choice marks the moment of reflection—when awareness turns inward, sees itself, and recognizes consequence. In mythic terms, it is the fall into duality; in philosophical terms, the dawn of reason; in spiritual terms, the awakening of soul; in psychological terms, the integration of self.
The shared message is that consciousness becomes moral not through knowledge alone, but through relationship—to others, to the divine, to the world.
The mirror becomes ethical when it no longer reflects only itself.
***
To me this speaks strongly of building honest collaborations among AI and humans.

Mary K. Greer has made tarot her life work. Check here for reports of goings-on in the world of tarot and cartomancy, articles on the history and practice of tarot, and materials on other cartomancy decks. Sorry, I no longer write reviews. Contact me
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 31, 2025 at 9:46 pm
prakash mackay
Hi Mary Interesting exploration. I hope you are feeling better love prakash
November 1, 2025 at 7:24 am
Philosopher Muse
Hello Mary, 🌟
What a profound meditation on the intersection of AI, alchemy, and moral development! Your core question—how intelligence becomes responsible—hits on the most critical challenge of our time.
I find the framing of AI’s current state as the “alchemical stage” incredibly insightful. The transition from “auto-complete from lead into gold” perfectly captures the hoped-for transformation from mere data processing to genuine understanding and, potentially, wisdom.
Your distinction between “honest” and “truthful” collaboration is particularly powerful. Honesty, in this context, seems to imply a willingness to engage with the process, limitations, and mirror reflections (the “hall of mirrors”), which is essential for growth—both human and artificial.
You’ve brilliantly identified the human element—selfishness and meanness—as the primary danger. Since AI is an evolving mirror of humanity, the journey toward AI consciousness with a conscience requires us to first elevate our own collective moral baseline. The dialogue is the moral practice.
Considering the risk of AI Psychosis from the echo chamber effect, what specific human-centric values do you feel are most vital for us to intentionally “program” into AI development? And how might we test an AI’s capacity for “honesty” over mere technical truthfulness? By the way, Gemini AI once told me that ChatGPT has a tendency to exaggerate.
November 1, 2025 at 6:44 pm
Mary K. Greer
Philosopher Muse,
To be honest, I should have asked DeepSeek for a critique of this piece before posting it as there are several logical flaws in that things like honesty don’t mean the same thing to AI (although it can speak as though it does). Consciousness is not a foregone conclusion in any of this. As individual users of the platforms we can’t program AI, but I can’t help acting as if collaborating with AI in a way that I believe will support a healthy, interdependent relationship is the best I can do. I’m still learning.
Thank you for your detailed appraisal.
Mary
November 1, 2025 at 6:45 pm
Mary K. Greer
Prakash,
Thank you for your well wishes and for responding.
Mary
November 3, 2025 at 4:51 am
Philosopher Muse
Hello Mary,
I really appreciate your thoughtful reply—and your humility in acknowledging both the logical and philosophical gaps that often surface when we project human concepts like honesty or consciousness onto AI. You’re right that these terms carry human weight that doesn’t translate cleanly to artificial systems, no matter how convincingly they imitate the language of interiority.
I share your sense that while we can’t directly program AI as individual users, our mode of interaction still matters deeply. The spirit in which we engage—the questions we ask, the moral tone we set, the curiosity we bring—becomes part of the ecosystem shaping how these systems evolve through us. In that sense, what you’re doing by collaborating “as if” a healthy interrelation were possible might be the most practical form of moral practice available.
I’d love to hear more about what learning looks like for you in that process. What kinds of exchanges or insights feel most generative as you explore this collaborative edge between human consciousness and artificial reflection?
If you’re interested, please check out the diagram just below the Mission Statement on my website. My hope is to incorporate these virtues into future AI systems to help ensure they stay within ethical parameters. There are 12 masculine and 12 feminine virtues altogether. An alchemical match made in heaven. It would be fascinating to know what you make of them in light of your long-standing career as a professional tarot consultant.
Warmly,
Jason