It is assumed that tarot readers use either psychic or intuitive abilities. In fact, these are, almost always, among their skills. Querents usually come for a reading because they are looking for information outside the normal, rational processes for obtaining it. They want that “something extra,” even if it’s just entertainment.
What I want to query today is:
• Why are ‘psychic’ and ‘intuitive’ so often conflated into a single thing? (A web search on psychic + intuitive should convince you that the words often appear together to express the same thing.)
• As tarot readers do we know when we are using psychic rather than intuitive faculties and vice versa?
The terms psychic and intuitive actually describe two different processes that could be seen as opposite ends of a spectrum. One can even trigger another. By using both words together or interchangeably we attempt to cover all bases. Can we improve our skill in using these abilities? Yes. But it helps to differentiate between them— at least while developing them as skills.
Psychic is usually described as “extra sensory perception.” It accesses information beyond the reach of our normal senses. Thus, it is deemed paranormal; a sixth sense. The term psychic was first used by the French astronomer Camille Flammarion in the 1860s and, soon after, by the chemist William Crookes to describe the spiritualist medium Daniel Douglas Home. Originally it implied seership, prophecy or mediumship. Now it refers to a broad range of abilities including telepathy, clairvoyance, clairaudience, and precognition.
Psi research (parapsychology) has amassed enough evidence to convince all but a few of the most skeptical scientists, who have examined this evidence, of its existence. Even the CIA and then the military had what they called a “remote viewing” program from the early 1970s until 1995.
Intuition, on the other hand, is the completely normal functioning of human cognition. It is part of a bodily survival mechanism. It has been called gut feeling, a hunch, instinct or insight. It involves intelligence at work without conscious thought. Essentially it is the act or process of coming to direct knowledge without reasoning or inferring. With intuition we sense truth without explanations. Using unconscious forms of analogy and induction we instantly perceive connections and patterns. This sometimes results in a clear direction for action.
Both psychic awareness and intuition communicate to us through symbols, sensory feelings and emotions, which is one reason why they may be so hard to separate. With intuition, however, we can sometimes justify our hunches by backtracking and discerning sensory input and mental connections that only make sense after the fact. By contrast, with a true psychic impression a direct connection simply doesn’t exist, except, perhaps, when interpreting feelings and symbols in which the psychic impression can be cloaked.
I highly recommend two books for understanding and developing your intuition:
• Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious by Gerd Gigerenzer.
• The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals that Protect Us from Violence by Gavin de Becker.
Gerd Gigerenzer is a director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. His research was a major source for Malcolm Gladwell’s bestseller Blink. In Gut Feelings, he describes intuition as a judgment that appears quickly, whose underlying reasons we are not fully aware of, yet is strong enough to act upon. “It ignores information, violates the laws of logic, and is the source of many human disasters.” On the other hand, as Gigerenzer shows, it can outwit the most sophisticated reasoning and computational strategies.
Intuitional skills can be learned. Gigerenzer explains how it often works through simple rules of thumb that take advantage of cognitive abilities, recognition memory, social instincts, and visual tracking.
Gavin de Becker, in The Gift of Fear, says, “Intuition is the journey form A to Z without stopping at any other letter along the way. It is knowing without knowing why.” True, this book focuses on high-stakes predictions: how to spot subtle signs of danger to avoid violence. Yet, it is one of the best and most compassionate books I know that tells you how to recognize and when to trust intuition.
How do you tell the difference between fear that is true and fear that is unwarranted? “Intuition is always learning,” de Becker tells us, “and though it may occasionally send a signal that turns out to be less than urgent, everything it communicates to you is meaningful. Unlike worry, it will not waste your time.”
Intuition comes to us through emotions, persistent thoughts, physical sensations, wonder, anxiety and humor. De Becker’s “elements of prediction,” along with Gigerenzer’s “rules of thumb,” can help you make better decisions than just relying on reason alone.
Intuition can arise during a tarot reading in countless ways. One of these is when symbols in several cards suddenly seem to come forward and link together to reveal a repeating or developing theme. Everything else can appear to recede in the face of the insistence and aliveness of these symbols. In face-to-face readings, subtle clues from the querent—including things picked up from so-called “cold reading”—will echo meanings in the cards, creating a kind of resonance. Words said by the querent can ring with truth, especially when they match keywords for cards in the spread.
Tarot readers can become much more aware of when and how they access intuition in a reading. They can then help a querent recognize when the querent’s own intuitions have been activated and may contain valuable truths.
The picture above is an amalgam of four cards from the Crowley-Harris Thoth deck. Can you identify them?
I’ll write later about psychic development and another important ability in reading tarot, empathy.
13 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 23, 2008 at 11:30 am
Toni Riss
Dear Mary,
Some 30 years ago you were one of my favorite instructors at New College, but you may not remember me. I’ve never forgotten you though.
I’ve been searching for you on/off for a while. I wanted to thank you for teaching me so much about the tarot. The class I took was the “Tarot of Awareness”. It’s been a few years since I’ve even looked at a tarot deck, but I do remember that the symbolism you taught us about and how it impacts us.
Ironically, I’ve become interested in the tarot again because of critical health situation I am trying to cope with. I’ve been battling advanced breast cancer for a few years now. My cancer has spread to the bone and has not gone any place else. I have much to learn, but am glad you are still out there doing what you do best.
You were one of the best teachers I ever had. I feel blessed to be able to say I remember you.
Namaste,
Toni Riss Class of 78
March 23, 2008 at 8:42 pm
marygreer
Dear Toni,
Of course I remember you—you are hard to forget :-). How wonderful it is to hear from you, these 30 years later, despite its being at such a difficult time in your life.
You might find Christine Jette’s tarot books helpful in your journey. A nurse and health educator, she wrote Tarot for the Healing Heart: Using Inner Wisdom to Heal Body and Mind and Tarot Shadow Work: Using the Dark Symbols to Heal. Not all books are right for everyone, so use your own intuition and judgment to decide if you want to delve into these techniques.
With prayers in my heart for your well-being,
Mary
March 28, 2008 at 3:03 am
Marina
Mary, thank you for linking to this article. It has helped me to see the difference between being psychic and being intuitive…and also, to see how cold reading and intuition get closer, but do not mingle.
I’m not and never was a psychic or medium or anything, and for a long time i thought it was a hindrance for my tarot learning – everybody i knew who read tarot also heard things, talked to guides, saw ghosts…why was i excluded from the party? But thank goodness, lately, i’ve been learning that intuition can be a good partner in tarot readings, and that like a muscle, you need to exercise it in order to improve. You don’t have to be ‘special’ or ‘gifted’…you just have to learn to listen, to pay attention.
March 28, 2008 at 4:47 am
marygreer
Marina, amen to that.
Mary
April 12, 2008 at 11:56 am
Abella Arthur
Dear Mary,
I’m just getting into your books and I love your breadth of knowledge. Your words of passion just leap off the pages and get my brain juices flowing; thank you.
I’m a very practical and logical person yet spiritual too. I feel as if there’s an explanation for everything, even the currently unexplainable. After spending years trying to *define* what intuition was for me, because I found the dictionary definitions lacking and wanted to explain what it was that was happening to me, I got my answer. The following definition, which I divined after meditating, finally completed a long played out puzzle.
“Intuition is a combination of historical (empirical) data, deep and heightened observation and an ability to cut through the thickness of surface reality. Intuition is like a slow motion machine that captures data instantaneously and hits you like a ton of bricks. Intuition is a knowing, a sensing that is beyond the conscious understanding — a gut feeling. Intuition is not pseudo-science.” Abella Arthur
My definition of what it is to be psychic came about for similar reasons too.
“Being psychic is the ability to use a normal sense to a heightened degree and in unusual ways.
Sight = Clairvoyance, Feeling/Touch = Clairsentience, Hearing = Clairaudient, Knowing = Claircognizance, Tasting = Clairgustance, and Smelling = Clairalience.”
For this reason, I can say that everyone has the ability to be psychic — with development — or holds the power of being psychic because we all possess the seed to grow as we may.
And finally, while I used to call myself an Intuitive, feeling as if I was a Reader, and then moving to the term Psychic, I have settled on wanting to be known as an Interpreter of signs and symbols when doing a plain reading. But it’s not like I can use that term much on the Internet because few would be trying to find a Spiritual Interpreter. Having said all this, I feel as if my destiny is as a Wisdom Guide — Guiding people to their own wisdom and interpretation through tools like Tarot, Intuition, Psychic ability and the like. 🙂
And unrelated: Do you consider a colour, a symbol? I find that while reading Tarot I can come to a colour and then make an interpretation based on that colour.
Keep up the great work.
All the best.
Abella Arthur
April 13, 2008 at 12:38 am
marygreer
Abella –
Thanks for your comment on intuition and psi. I too like to meditate on and try out definitions until I get to one that really works for me. While I personally think that psychic ability is normal in that it’s a natural human (& probably plant and animal) ability, it is helpful to think of it as outside of the “normal” sensory sphere to distinguish it from intuition. The information is not available to our regularly acknowledged senses. As you note with the list of “clairs . . .” a theorized “sixth sense” actually operates through heightened qualities of all the senses. In my book 21 Ways to Read a Tarot Card, I have a diagnostic test that helps you identify which imaginative senses are strongest for you.
I think your distinctions among Intuitive, Psychic, Reader, Interpreter and Guide are interesting. In fact we use all of them in such a fluid way that the different functions are closely intwined.
As to color, I’d say it’s “used symbolically.” We tend to think of a symbol as a thing, but other abstractions also have symbolic meaning, like “height” and the prepositions “in,” “out,” “behind,” etc. and many more characteristics picked up by the senses. Hope that answers your question.
Mary
April 21, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Kay Stopforth
Mary – thanks for articulating and clarifying this important distinction; it’s something that’s nagged at me for a long time. As someone who tends towards the intuitive rather than the psychic, I found myself almost “apologising” to querents in advance for not being psychic!
Yet strongly intuitive readings can seem to have a psychic edge because the intuited stuff seems to come from “somewhere else.” What I’m still not sure about is where the boundary lies between the personal unconcsious that is the realm of intuition and the great collective unconscious where myths, archetypes and symbols also dwell (and which is also presumably the realm of the psychic).
Your blog has given me lots of food for thought!
all the best,
Kay
April 22, 2008 at 4:09 am
marygreer
Kay –
I don’t think anyone knows where the boundary lies – after all it’s in the unconscious! I’m also not sure if the psychic is just the realm of the collective unconscious. I think individuals can become “entangled” (to borrow a word improperly from physics) without accessing a universal collective. Of course, all of this is pure speculation since no one has ever been able to prove a collective unconscious; at this point it’s just a theory.
For me intuition involves a sort of instantaneous analysis, although I may only be able to explain it after the fact. Much of it involves pattern-recognition. Psychic abilities are completely “other” than analysis—although I can and should analyze what “works” and “doesn’t work” after the fact in order to help me recognize the most reliable kinds of insights versus the “wish fulfillment” or trying to “fix things” kinds of stuff that my mind comes up with.
Mary
October 20, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Mark
Mary,
Another good book on intuition is: Practical Intuition by Laura Day. It was wonderful. It showed how a reading can even work in reverse, first by doing the reading then by revealing the question.
Brightest Blessings to you Mary,
Mark
February 19, 2009 at 9:33 am
Kath
I have a question, who do so many refer to the books? Are the books suppose to be writ in stone? My teacher threw out all my books on tarot and instructed me to rely on both my psychic and intuitive instincts. She told me that readers who refer to books have no intuitive or psychic skills at all.
March 15, 2009 at 3:52 pm
epsychic
I agree with Kath. I built up a collection of books that were, essentially, useless.
A good friend of mine, who is an internationally known psychic, told me to dump the idea of learning anything from books. Books don’t make you psychic, you do.
I’ve developed more in the year I took her advice than in the 10 years before!
March 17, 2009 at 4:21 pm
mkg
Kath & epsychic –
There are psychics who include tarot in their psychic practice and then there are tarotists who are more-or-less psychic. A psychic who uses tarot as either a foil (because it’s expected by clients) or to stimulate their psychic impressions can usually throw the books away. A tarot reader who reads the cards rather than their own impressions usually needs a system to work with–a least when they are starting. Books teach tried-and-true systems and interpretations–things that the author has found helpful. Other tarot readers focus on interpreting symbols and therefore need to learn all they can about symbols and how they work. Empaths usually combine empathic reactions to a client with the meanings of the cards.
There’s no one way to read the cards. That’s why I wrote 21 Ways to Read a Tarot Card. I didn’t include psychic reading in that book because that would require a whole book in itself. I feel that basically we all have psychic ability though some people are gifted in that area. Most people can improve their skills through study and practice. Both of you had a teacher or psychic friend who guided you. Others don’t have that luxury and therefore depend on books.
Since many of the books have been written by someone who has practiced the art for a long time I get the benefit of his or her experience. By studying many books I learn a whole range of possible approaches; it’s made me much more flexible. A life-long study of the tarot, in all its aspects, will take you into almost every area of scholarship and give you a darn good liberal arts education.
My question is, if you are a psychic and don’t need to read books on the tarot to use them, then why use tarot at all? Why not just read the person psychically?
Mary
April 17, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Biddy Tarot
I have always been a strong believer that every human is intuitive to an extent and that intuition can be learned. It all depends on how willing the individual is to access their intuitive abilities or to open their mind up to different energies. In this way, I also believe that anyone can learn to read the Tarot – you don’t necessarily have to be ‘psychic’ to do so.
Additionally, I have found that over the years, I rely less and less on the traditional meanings of the Tarot cards, and now draw upon my intuition much more to interpret a Tarot reading. I pay more attention to the immediate responses I have when I see a card, rather than trying to recall the traditional Tarot card meaning. I have found that this gives a much more specific, accurate and interesting reading.
Thanks for sharing the ‘theory’ behind it all – I can see why this is one of the most popular posts!
Biddy