Updated: May 10, 2017
Here is the advice of 45 experienced reader and teachers of tarot and a few newbies. The contradictions are intended to foster respect and understanding for alternate views.
History is based on facts and therefore can express only what can be demonstrated with evidence or carefully deduced from an in-depth understanding of the facts, the culture, the period and the people. New facts can totally change what was formerly thought to be true.
Myths are false stories that reveal some kind of inner Truth. That Truth is often not what the myth conveys on its surface. Someone called them “the Great Imaginings behind this World.” However, they can lead us along paths that aren’t real or can even be harmful, for instance when they become “rules” that unnecessarily limit our experience.
It’s been said that history is true on the outside but a lie on the inside (for instance, we’ll never know what people actually felt and did). Whereas a myth is a lie on the outside and true on the inside (however, discerning the truth it points to can be tricky).
There are at least two kinds of tarot myths:
- Stories of tarot’s origins (mostly romantic and mystical stories with great inner significance),
- “Rules” that should be followed only if you find them helpful and meaningful.
We actually know quite a bit about tarot history:
It originated sometime between 1420 and 1440 in Northern Italy, probably in the court of Milan or Ferrara or possibly even Florence, amid other experiments in creating a suit of triumphal cards. We also know fairly precisely what the images signified in the “High Gothic”-to-early-Renaissance Italian culture. A trip to Northern Italy will confirm the ubiquitous nature of the allegorical images in the late 14th and early 15th centuries.
Playing cards (as shown below) appeared in Europe and spread quickly about 60-75 years before the Triumphs were added to the deck. For the first 350 years ‘Il Trionfos’ were known almost entirely for playing games similar to whist or bridge as attested to by several frescos and text references.
While there are are rare indications early on that both playing cards and tarot were used for divination and character delineations (in poems called Tarocchi Appropriati), true “reading” practices were not widely known until the late 18th century. This is when Antoine Court de Gébelin, Le Comte de Mellet, and Jean-Baptiste Alliette (Etteilla) wrote about tarot and fortune-telling and made up stories about their being brought to Europe by the gypsies from their mystical place of origin in Egypt (none of which has been substantiated in the slightest). Likewise, the idea of Tarot originating with either Jewish or Christian Kabbalists or with the Cathars has not a shred of evidence, even though both were known to exist in Milan during the period. Regarding the 22 Hebrew letters, early references always describe the Trumps as numbering 21, with a separate mention for the Fool (or ‘Excuse’) card.
There is still a lively debate about the etymology of the plural word Tarocchi for the deck and Tarocco for the game (which was shortened at least a hundred years later in central Europe to Tarot, Taroc or Tarock). My favorite origin story is that the root of Tarocchi is similar to that for the Sicilian Blood Orange, Tarocco, that has a pitted skin. This makes it look like the hammered gold leaf backgrounds of early court decks, from the Arabic word for ‘hammered’ (taraqa) describing a design technique used on gold and leather.
Please read Sherryl Smith’s Tarot History Chronology, TarotL History Information Sheet and my post: “Origins of Cartomancy (Playing Card Divination).” The serious student will want to check out trionfi.com, Cultural Association “Le Tarot”, the Tarot History Forum and Tarot History & Iconography at aeclectic, among others. Books are recommended on these sites and here.
The advice given here regarding the importance of history by our panel of tarot experts (and a few newbies) wasn’t easy to organize. I’ve done quite a bit of condensing and of merging of similar statements. Personally, I was originally intrigued by the myths as they supported my interest in esoteric studies and in doing readings. It was only later that I came to truly appreciate the vital importance of history and how it adds great depth my understanding of the meaning of the cards. Factual history adds to our knowledge; it doesn’t subtract from it.
Anti-History
• Just starting to read tarot? No, it’s not important to know tarot history and myth. All that’s important to know is that tarot is a divination tool.
• History is not necessary for newbies. Myths and archetypes work even if you don’t know how or what their history is. They are timeless, that is, relevant to all times. Newbies need the Magic first!
• Too much delving into the traditional side of things stops many people from picking up a deck and gaining tremendous benefit. Fear and overwhelm is far too prevalent.
• No knowledge of the history of Tarot is needed to start developing a relationship with Tarot. Anyone can start to use and have their intuition stimulated by the images of the cards.
• In the end, when one reads or is doing a reading, the mind must open and the reading must come together from the cards and the spread (not from the history).
• History is not relevant. All you need to know is that tarot works.
• History is a story, but it’s not really about NOW.
• Let tarot speak to us in the way that it will. History is something different.
• Stick with what you DO know; do not rely on the past or on outside forces to tell you.
• The history or myth, accurate or inaccurate, is NOT what gives the Tarot its power. Its universal and comprehensive nature does.
• Dwelling in the past, while instructional, can also be a total diversion and take you away from the present. History is often confused and distorted, nobody knows for certain what really happened. History is incidental.
• As the history and origins of the tarot are still unknown and every foreword of almost every tarot instruction book has a different take on it, it’s not vital that a newbie know the origins.
• Since the origins are so murky and since the influence of several cultures is evident even in the earliest decks, anyone who claims to know THE origin of the Tarot should check their facts.
• Too much information can be overwhelming. References to ‘this deck or that deck’, the various correspondences and so forth, sounds a bit OCD and geekish. The idea that to become an adept reader requires this meticulous in-depth knowledge is off-putting.
Pro-History
• The history of Tarot is always worth looking into: it is important to know. It gives you a basis and understanding of the Tarot as you develop a relationship with the cards.
• Do the research on the history as well as the myths. It gives you a better understanding of Tarot, and the more you understand the Tarot, the better your readings will be.
• All students should read the TarotL History Information Sheet.
• Knowing your roots gives a sense of foundation and stability—like the difference between a mobile home and a castle.
• It’s like buying a creepy old house & NOT asking about previous tenants. It’s important to know the history proper.
• Mythology has its place, but not in place of fact. Much of what people consider to be history is actually myth. But you won’t know the difference if you don’t learn the history.
• Anyone using Tarot (even if completely intuitively) without at least a basic awareness of its history and its historical context is surely missing an integral part of its charm, character and richness.
• Every person who chooses to use a magical tool . . . owes it to hirself to do enough research to understand fully what the tool is and is not.
• It is simply common sense on a magical and spiritual level to know what you are connecting yourself to, and what it will and will not do.
• Recognizing the history and the myths allow tarotists be more conscious of their spiritual capacities.
• To work with Tarot more seriously as guide / wisdom tool, especially with others, it is important to know the history, mystery, and lore of the Tarot.
• When anyone begins to approach Tarot with any amount of seriousness and dedication, then it’s a good idea to dig a little deeper.
• With any other tool, you would read the instruction manual and directions.
• Knowing the history and myths gives you a better understanding and, when you are trying to learn, you want to know as much as you can.
• When you have a reader who DOESN’T know the history sitting down to read for a client who DOES know it, the reader’s credibility may be called into question.
• If you are going to offer it to the public, you should be knowledgeable about the origins and history.
• A foundation in history reveals the facts vs. the traditions and myths, among which the tarot reader can then choose.
• Tarot is not just a means of divination; it is a game played even today by many people to amuse themselves. This information is important because it makes us aware of tarot as whole, of all its possibilities.
• History reminds us not to be overly serious about something whose first origins were as a game.
• Tarot history becomes more a study of the culture and mindset of the people of the time. We will never know just who modeled for the art or what the artist was trying to convey, or whether he (or she!) placed some inside joke or insult within the portrait. However, we can know something about the cultural backdrop in which these images were created, and how people generally viewed themselves, God, others, and life.
• There can be a huge disconnect when we apply our modern cultural understanding and meaning to these images without also transporting the best understanding of the originating culture’s understanding and meaning into the mix.
• It helps to “get it” first in the original context before bringing that understanding into the modern context.
• One’s experience of Tarot will not be as full and complete as it can be without the study, the books, the explorations into cards and the collections of decks.
• By showing us the marvelous and mysterious innovation of the historical tarot, it invites us to keep making history with the Tarot. Wouldn’t we want people a 100 or 200 years from now to know a bit about how we used Tarot here at the start of the 21st century?
Anti-Myths
• Newbies really want to do it “right” and can be told by well-meaning people all manner of tarot rules, much of which are unnecessary for readers.
• A person may falsely believe, for example, that it is required to cut the deck in a specific way or the reading isn’t valid.
• The tarot doesn’t have to be given to you as a gift! I hate that myth!
• Getting a deck is a personal choice. If I waited for someone to buy me a deck, I wouldn’t have one yet today!
• There are people who insist that the only way to cut the cards is with the left hand. Will an amputee never be able to get a reading?
• Many myths of origin have been dispelled as false.
• A discussion (and hopefully rejection) of some of those more silly or frightening myths would be most welcome.
Pro-Myths
• Even though the myths are, for the most part, not factually true, they still have an impact on Tarot, its meanings, and the way it is used.
• The actual history of how tarot started is not the most important thing, but rather the principles involved, the need for humans to tell their story.
• The Tarot is a grand story of the soul, and seekers beginning to explore that Tarot should know the role of every card, and it’s part in the grand stage of the soul.
• Many of the “rules” surrounding Tarot originated with some real purpose at the time, others seem to be more “magical” in nature. Use rituals that help to make your sitter comfortable and open to the exchange.
• I’m starting a “myth” that one should *always* offer their cards to their beloved deity or Higher Power.
• Regarding the “rules,” myth is more important than history, for the mere fact that you don’t have to follow the myths [rules]. They tell what NOT to do. Everyone needs to discover their own way.
The Middle Way
• Follow your interests. If it leads to history and myth, go for it, if not . . . wait.
• It’s about both: study and jump in and use your intuition/imagination to do readings.
• Don’t teach history during a reading. In the moment to moment of the session, it isn’t relevant unless it pertains to the client issue. The art on the cards is the most important.
• There isn’t any definitive approach to tarot. Initial ingorance can serve to one’s advantage. Early intrigue can evolve into a lifelong interest in tarot that includes history, myth and lore.
• It’s good to get just enough history to pique your interest, and wonderful to have the “real” history unfold gradually through further studies.
• At first I wasn’t really interested with this kind of history, but now I think that it’s quite important to know how, when and why tarot was created.
• Never hurts to know it. There are readers who naturally gravitate toward that stuff and others who do just as well not knowing the mythological background.
• Academic/historical study, for this novice should be considered as one ‘module’ within the learning program. A little bit of history can be intriguing.
• There is a real need to understand where these images have come from. Every newbie reader needs to know a bit of how these images have evolved.
• What someone new to the Tarot wants is background information. If some myths are brought to the table, fine, but there is so much basic stuff to get under one’s belt. Principally focus on the deck, its composition and its uses.
• I think newbies should learn to read a deck and carry out divination and then, go to the myths. Otherwise they may never get to the tarot’s divinatory action.
• The myths should be reviewed, then kept or discarded—as each person is an individual.
• Most of what newbies will read about the history, is indeed myth, mystery and lore. Truth isn’t the same as fact; facts change. Myths, mystery, and lore can be powerful, enlightening, and empowering. In the end, a person gets to choose their own truth.
• You feel enriched and free to experiment when you know there are a variety of things to sample and use. It keeps you from getting bored.
• The more you learn, the more shades of meaning and subtleties open up for your understanding and use. It’s like giving a painter more colors and brushes to work with. Every serious Newbie should understand that there is an almost infinite palette of options to choose from.
• History can show how tarot archetypes have been interpreted by others, so in this regard, soak up as many different takes on these archetypes as possible, until the information all merges, disappears, and the essence remains.
• It’s always a good idea to know as much as you can about the background and symbolism of things. Tarot imagery is somewhat ambiguous, and the reader can read into it whatever gains their attention. But, the cards have intended meanings, and if you know them, you can filter out (or accept) meanings you get from your subconscious that don’t fit.
• The tarot is not what you make it, or whatever you want it to be. It is still tarot, and specifically definable as a book of spiritual wisdom in picture form. It is open to interpretation, but has an actual history and traditions that surround it. Make sure students understand it has historical roots along with wings that soar into the future.
• Only learn the history if it’s your reading style to use the history of the cards to make up their meanings.
• With some newbies, tarot can be likened to handing a monkey a calculator; they’ll see it as a shiny toy, not realizing all the wonderful things it can tell you and help you figure out. With others it can be likened to handing the Rosetta Stone to a competent archaeologist: it unlocks a whole new world of information.
• It’s good to maintain a student mindset or “white belt mind” regardless of experience or knowledge.
• There’s the history that’s based on factual evidence: geological, archeological, etc., and there’s history as recorded by those who invent, misinterpret, embellish and downright lie. By ‘studying’ history, one might accumulate information or opinions, but not necessarily facts or the truth. The history of Tarot is no exception.
• There is a saying, “History is written by the winners.” Just because it may have been unwritten, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
Additional Advice from Contributors
• The occult tarot is relatively recent (since Antoine Court de Gébelin in 1781) and not the only way of approaching the cards.
• The tarot is what you make it.
• Tarot was not created as part of any religious or even magical tradition, which makes the reader free to adapt it to his own beliefs. The most important thing is that you feel comfortable.
• Each of us owes it to ourselves, our Inner Sight, and the Ancestors of Tarot amongst us, to approach with a recognition that there is a shared, enduring, and active Wraith of Spirit here in Tarot, with which we are participating.
• Be responsible for what you are doing when you call in guides and spirit helpers. If you do not know something about it, just don’t go there.
• Some people get too hung up on how they think they should interpret a card rather than letting the deeper layers of consciousness help to guide them through the nuances of meaning. Core meanings are fixed in the psyche whether one consciously knows it or not.
• It’s especially helpful to know the connection between Tarot and modern day playing cards and that it’s possible to do a reading with a deck of cards.
• Symbols matter. But not even symbols have to be set in stone.
• Find a deck that has a symbolic system with which you feel comfortable. Not everyone can use the same deck!
37 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 20, 2011 at 1:20 pm
Douglass White
This is an excellent and broad range of discussion and viewpoints about the roles of history and myth in study of the Tarot. Personally I like to delve into the history, but keep that separate from readings unless a myth or story has relevance to the reading at hand.
From my research into the origins of Tarot I find that it goes back much earlier than 15th century Europe. That is only when painted and printed playing cards came into use there. Games and divination have evolved together for thousands of years. Divination similar to that of the Tarot existed in ancient Egypt. The difference was that they used amulets, tokens, and game boards. Much new information is coming to light on the evolution of divination systems that were ancestral to the Tarot. I have written a book called the Senet Tarot of Ancient Egypt and designed a Tarot deck of the same name as well as an Oracle Game Board based on documents that survive from ancient Egypt. The Chinese also had an ancient divination system that resembles the Tarot in many ways. If interested, download the book at http://www.dpedtech.com. Click on the Store button and scroll to the free book download. Comments, corrections, and other suggestions are appreciated.
July 20, 2011 at 3:31 pm
mkg
Douglass –
Of course all cultures have had divination systems and they are closely related to games and, in many cases, are identical—as the history of games has shown regarding early human gaming. It sounds to me as if you’ve defined tarot in a special, private way (not the formal definitions found in books on tarot or dictionaries) as meaning any kind of small portable pictures, including money, or amulet, or board game that could be used for divination. Why not simply call them divination tools, and then we can all be in agreement. Yes, tarot, as divination, can be seen as a stage in the historical evolution of divination. That doesn’t make earlier divination tools into tarot.
July 20, 2011 at 5:47 pm
Paris
This is empowering, Mary, and I thank you for putting this together. The bewildering array of books and decks facing the newcomer to Tarot today is daunting if not out-and-out off-putting. Many readers study in dozens of different ways, but it all comes down to one point in time, the moment of the reading itself. We make meaning at that moment, and it’s utterly contextual to all of the energies of the reading’s time and place and the people present and a host of other influences. “Newbie, choose a deck that looks like fun. Look at the card and tell me what you see.” The rest will come.
July 22, 2011 at 5:04 pm
Biddy | Biddy Tarot
Hi Mary,
What a wonderful post, bringing together the various points of view on the Tarot. It really goes to show that there is no one, right way of doing things and that it comes down to your personal belief system and what feels right to you.
Even with fifteen years’ experience reading Tarot, I have never really delved deeply into the history side of things and I do not feel that this has detracted from my ability to provide a good Tarot reading to my clients. That said, I do think that building a deeper understanding of the history may continue to build my knowledge and insight into the cards, but I do not necessarily think it is a precursor to being able to read the cards well.
Warm regards,
Biddy
July 22, 2011 at 7:34 pm
mkg
Biddy,
I, too, love all the different points of view. I agree that being a good reader is not dependent on knowing the history. However, it can bring flexibility and depth to one’s readings. When you are stuck about the meaning of a card, that flexibility and knowledge can help you see the card from perspectives you might not have otherwise considered. I feel the same way about knowing classical mythology. It adds a tremendous richness to see one’s life from a mythical perspective—what someone called recognizing “the big story.” We need to remember sometimes that the Fool can be a holy innocent or a babbling street person, hounded out of town. The Hanged Man can be a blessed martyr or a traitor whose shame serves as a warning to all.
July 23, 2011 at 11:19 am
Douglass White
Hi MKG,
Thanks for your reply on my comments on your excellent collection of Tarot viewpoints. I would suggest that you read my book on the subject (The Senet Tarot of Ancient Egypt) and examine the archaeological, literary, and artistic evidence before deciding that my comments about the history of Tarot are simply my “special, private way” of defining Tarot. I agree that I put forth new evidence and new interpretations that are not accepted yet by the “mainstream” of Tarot “definers”. However, I have been tracing the evolution of amulets, board games, ritual symbols, and so forth with particular focus on those elements that evolved into what we now call Tarot (but more properly should call Tarok). The evolution occurred in stages and was a multi-cultural process. We can not talk about Tarot “cards” before the invention of modern paper, so there is no argument there about the medium. However, I think you will find that the contents of the cards, especially what we call the Trumps, evolved very early. Another fascinating issue is how the decks happened to end up with 78 cards as the most widely used “standard”. There are principles of mathematics and geometry involved in the choice. I find that the gravitation to a set of 78 occurred during the 18th and 19th dynasties of New Kingdom Egypt and had specific ritual significance in that culture, the historical and spiritual ramifications of which we are just beginning to discover. The definition of a set of 22 Trumps may originate with the evolution of the Hebrew/Phoenician alphabet that was inspired by the Egyptian writing system (which included an alphabet subset among its glyphs). As you yourself state about the curious nature of history in your article above: “New facts can totally change what was formerly thought to be true.” Of course, the acceptance (or not) of my theories and interpretations rests from an academic viewpoint on the veracity of the evidence and the politics of academia. On the other hand, myths and archetypes (whether private or public) express truths that stand outside the boundaries of history, which is why there are many Egyptian style Tarot decks, and Rachel Pollack has even designed a “Shining Tribe” Tarot much of which is based on prehistoric art from around the world.
July 23, 2011 at 4:04 pm
mkg
Douglass,
I have looked pretty deeply into possible Egyptian sources of the tarot, even traveling twice to Egypt looking for them. I’ve researched what is known about Senet and have played it with a curator at the British Museum. Early mentions of the trumps refer to 21 trionfos plus il Matto (Fool) plus the four suits.
Twenty-one accords with the number of possible throws of two dice, and the Minor Arcana has the same number as the possible throws of three dice. Considering that both dice and cards were used in 15th-16th century books of lots, there seems to be an obvious relationship. As you note, Tarot (originally il Trionfos or ‘Triumphs’) are cards, a fifth suit added to playing cards to form a permanent trump suit, which is how they are used in the game of Tarot or Tarocchi. The word ‘Tarot’ was not used until at least a hundred years after the was invented and seems to be a Frenchification of tarocchi. Until some actual factual evidence comes up linking the Major Arcana with the exact same set of images or text from ancient Egypt, it falls under the category of speculation and/or myth. Personally, I think it would be exciting to find incontrovertible evidence.
I think it is worth noting that the three earliest examples (that I know of) of a Semetic alphabet occur in Egypt (if you include the turquoise mines of Hathor in the Sinai). It is theorized that it was invented by Jewish soldiers, traders and craftspeople as a quick means of communication—based, of course, on Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Yes, Rachel Pollack designed a tarot deck based on prehistoric art, but she makes no claim that tarot is prehistoric. There are many decks that focus on the archetypal similarities in the mythology of other cultures and even on the story lines of contemporary movies and TV shows—with no claims that they were the source of or copying tarot—for instance, The Mythic Tarot deck. If tarot is truly a masterful collection of core archetypal themes, then such parallels should be expected.
Mary
July 23, 2011 at 6:09 pm
mkg
Douglass –
I think it would help a great deal if you gave us your definition of Tarot. We may be talking about different things, which doesn’t help a conversation.
September 6, 2011 at 10:23 pm
Martin|Arcanos
Referring to the Major Arcana is clear that it originated long before the Middle Ages.
I do not think either that the major arcana are Egyptian creation.
The Egyptians were rather repositories of these secrets of the tarot.
September 7, 2011 at 12:31 am
mkg
There are lots of stories about the origins of the tarot. Personally, I have a story that I think is better than all the rest—but there is not a shred of evidence for it. That’s the difference between story/myth and history. Get some primary documentation or artifacts to support a theory and it can step from one category to the other. Learning history is partly about understanding the difference. Without supporting direct evidence all the dozens of theories are pretty much equal and simply nice stories.
January 18, 2014 at 2:56 am
Kathy Morandini
Fascinating….. Newbie but not really . Something keeps me from remembering the meaning of each card even though I got my first deck over 25 years ago. Yet I am never far from a deck and I am mindful of the cards in everything I do. Perhaps my relationship with them comes from a past life that is begging to be unearthed and understood. None the less… My journey is taking me deeper into the “woods” where all will be revealed. This was a very important step for me. Finding this and commenting…. And so it is…. And I am grateful.
January 22, 2014 at 6:27 pm
mkg
I’ve never been able to memorize the cards. I tell stories about the images for many of the decks and, over time, I develop a conceptual understanding of the cards and how they interact with each other. My books focus on different ways to develop your own relationship with the cards.
September 12, 2014 at 2:08 am
brittik
Today was my first day with Tarot. I just looked at 8 cards, tried to translate what their images were telling me and wrote my understandings in a journal. I will soon buy a deck of cards. Your blog got me started.
Thank You So Much! 🙂
September 12, 2014 at 9:44 am
mkg
Brittik – Congratulations on your beginnings. Be sure to keep what you wrote as it will be fascinating to look back on years from now.
November 3, 2014 at 5:34 pm
Rose
Can I quote you? Or may I cite your page?
November 3, 2014 at 6:50 pm
mkg
Rose – Feel free to quote from this page or cite it. I ask that you include a link and make sure that your readers know it is compiled by me from the advice a lot of professional and experienced Tarot readers.
April 17, 2015 at 1:17 pm
Nishkama
Enjoy all that you offer…
You mention you have your own personal myth/ for the origin of tarot.. would love to hear your story! And feel inspired to find my own!
Thanks
April 17, 2015 at 2:14 pm
mkg
Nishkama – I haven’t written up my fairytale and story form and itwould be too long for the comments section. Maybe someday.
April 29, 2015 at 4:48 am
Soledad Zengotita
Hello Mary, thank you for this post, I am not quite a beginner but always feel like one! I would like to ask, when you say that we know what the images signified in the late Gothic, early Renaissance North Italian culture: is there a particular reading you recommend about this? And also, I can´t find the TarotL History Information Sheet in English. Could you point me to its current location? Thanks! Soledad, from Argentina
September 23, 2015 at 12:02 am
Tarot Tree
♥ Love this ♥ I am going to reblog if you don’t mind, saves me time to research and write myself (I have two small children. Even a coffee break is cut short haha). Will definitely cite and link this properly 🙂 Thanks!!
September 23, 2015 at 12:06 am
Tarot Tree
Reblogged this on Tarot Tree Mystical Three and commented:
Ever wondered where Tarot originated? Here is a wonderful and interesting Blog post by Mary K. Greer. Definitely make some time to read this, even just out of curiousity 😉
September 23, 2015 at 11:29 am
mkg
Tarot Tree –
I’m always happy to see the “What every newbie Tarot reader . . .” posts reblogged.
February 21, 2016 at 2:08 pm
RB
Every time a person uses the word ‘myth’ synonymously for ‘lie’, an angel is stabbed to death.
February 21, 2016 at 2:11 pm
RB
To better understand Tarot – create your own deck.
February 21, 2016 at 2:14 pm
RB
…based on the traditional archetypes, ie, within the perimeters of the tradition, but let your own imagination loose, that is ;-).
February 21, 2016 at 3:53 pm
mkg
RB –
Personally I prefer the tale Joseph Campbell tells describing a myth as a lie on the outside and true on the inside.
Thanks for the suggestions.
March 15, 2016 at 2:36 pm
janostungli
tarot history: http://www.tarot.72.sk/?m=B2
tarot duality: http://tarot.72.sk/?m=EN
May 15, 2016 at 8:18 pm
Joe
Thank u for taken the time to put this together you have bean most help full. I am having trouble finding reliable sources for information regarding card and
May 21, 2016 at 8:43 am
Natalie Winter
Hi. Just discovered your blog, very interesting. Thought you might be interested to hear from me since I’m one of extremely few genuine Romani chovahànes (hereditary witches, keepers of history and folklore) still left following the old Pagan ways. And also, naturally, a Tarot reader. Obviously I can’t prove it, but our folklore suggests that we ourselves brought the practice to Europe; certainly we were using it for divination while the Europeans were still playing card games with it. It is also, I feel, rather more than a coincidence that the first attested appearances of Tarot in Italy come just a few decades after my people arrived in Southern Europe; the often-repeated story of the supposed Egyptian origin of the Tarot fits rather well with the belief at the time that my people originated from Egypt (hence the term “gypsy”, of course, which is quite wrong as we actually came from India and our culture and language are very clearly Indic) — and as for the unexplained etymology of the word “tarot”, you might find it interesting to know that in my dialect of the Romanes language, the verb *te tartel* means to examine or look into, and its past participle is *tarto* — and given the way that we tend to slur our words and the fact that until very recently most Romani were illiterate and poorly educated, I find that more than a little suggestive (and in other dialects it may be even closer, too).
June 28, 2016 at 10:35 am
mkg
Natalie –
I’m delighted to hear from you. Yes, as I understand it – the Rom arrived in Europe in the early 15th century (just prior to the Tarot) from the Balkans where they were escaping the Turks. Genetic evidence places Rom in the Balkans from around 600AD. Playing cards (as distinct from Tarot) arrived in Europe mid-14th century and were clearly derived from Persian and Mamluk cards.
Il Trionfos (triumphs), the original name of the Major Arcana, are High Gothic-styled allegorical figures common in the noble courts and culture of Northern Italy in the 14th and early 15th centuries and have nothing to do with the culture and imagery of the Rom peoples. The French word “tarot,” originally “taraux” or “tarau,” was not used until at least fifty years after the Triumph cards (which by the end of the 15th century were called Tarocchi). See this article by Italian historian Andrea Vitali for detailed facts regarding all the above: http://www.letarot.it/page.aspx?id=111
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of references to Gypsy fortune-telling from early on–almost exclusively palmistry. None reference cards until the end of the 18th century and no pictures or text indicate they used Tarot until the early 20th century, although it seems logical that Tarot was used by gypsies soon after the “arrival” of Tarot was ascribed to the gypsies (by Antoine Court de Gèbelin who first mentioned Tarot divination in 1783).
I have collected hundreds of copies of paintings and prints showing gypsy fortune-telling over the past 500 years. Not a single one before 1900 shows them reading the Major Arcana.
WIthout some concrete evidence of the Rom using Tarot before the 19th (or even 20th) century, it is nothing more than a story.
Antiques Roadshow on PBS is a great eye-opener as people regularly bring old letters from great grandparents detailing the long history of a cheished family heirloom that proves to be impossible (the item is scarcely older than the writer or it came from a different country than stated, etc.). The ancestor who wrote the document probably learned it from whoever gave the object to her and probably believed the story—but that alone does not make it true. Family stories are notoriously flawed as Geneology Roadshow also demonstrates.
By the way, I’m very interested in any concrete evidence that shows anything different than what I’ve said above!
Mary
June 28, 2016 at 11:28 am
Natalie Winter
Hi Mary…
I can’t offer any concrete (written) historical sources, because until the 20th century there simply weren’t any literate Romani — I’m only the second generation of my family to be literate and the first with higher education. But it seems unlikely to me that there would be so many references to use of Tarot in our oral history if it were only adopted three or four generations ago.
Moreover, in the British Isles during the 19th-20th century, the true Romanes language had been almost completely lost and had deteriorated into a pidgin form known as AngloRomanes, which is simply English with a few very mangled Romanes words embedded, and with English endings and grammar. Only a very few families in the Chovahàniski tradition, mine included, retained the original language over here, though numerous dialects are widespread in mainland Europe. And yet there are proper Romanes names for all 78 Tarot cards — my grandbibi taught them to me way back (Romanes is my first language). Where did they come from, given that all of the older members of my family, like most Romani older than my generation, were undocumented and therefore could not get paperwork to travel abroad? The names must logically be much older than 19th century.
Another interesting point — why are there two distinct traditions in Tarot decks, Christianized and Pagan? Our oral history tells that the original version was the Pagan tradition, with for instance Vasavipen [evil] in place of the Devil and I Chovahàni [the witch or priestess] in place of the Popess, but (just like Romani Paganism itself) it offended the “christian sensibilities” of the Europeans and was therefore edited, just as forced conversion was used to try to stamp out our original faith.
I have always and only used Pagan-tradition decks myself, incidentally — being a proper trad Chovahàni myself, the idea of using a christianized deck feels like a reminder of the forced conversion of many of my race and gets right up my nose.
I guess we will never know for certain just how the Tarot evolved, like such a lot of older history.
June 28, 2016 at 12:16 pm
mkg
Natalie –
I really can’t speak to the traditions of your family. It would be interesting to know if the names you learned for the cards are the same among the Rom of the European continent.
You say there are two distinct ‘traditions’ of Tarot deck–Christianized and Pagan. What are the Pagan decks to which you refer? I only know of Pagan decks that were created since the latter part of the 20th century.
Tarot cards were unavailable in England until the 20th century because of importation laws protecting the English playing card industry. Decks had to be purchased abroad – primarily in France or Italy. The first British deck was the Rider-Waite-Smith deck (1910).
Actually a surprising amount is known about the history of Tarot, even if we do not have an exact date and inventor. We do have a specific region, dated mentions in documents, and examples of early decks including variations in the trump suit (differing in the number of cards, ordering and, in one case, theme).
Mary
June 28, 2016 at 3:36 pm
Natalie Winter
Hi Mary…
The Pagan-tradition decks I have myself are recent, English-language ones — but the names of the Major Arcana, where they differ from the Christian-type decks, do correspond pretty well with the names I know for them in Romanes. There are some small discrepancies, for example the Old Path (my favourite deck) calls XV “temptation” whereas I’d be more inclined to translate Vasavipen into English as “evil” but they seem too close to be just coincidental and there is strong agreement between different decks. Furthermore the imagery on the modern Pagan decks corresponds with how I was taught to interpret the cards where there’s a significant difference with “trad” decks like RSW, yet I learned the art long before most of the current Pagan decks came out — I’m in my fifties and was trained to be a Chovahàni from birth, principally by my daieski-dai (mother’s mother, in English terms).
Sadly I don’t have any of my ancestors’ decks because under the rules of our culture, when someone dies, all personal artifacts are ritually “cremated” and it is culturally forbidden to pass them on; this is especially unbreakable with any magical implements — all of this a hold-over from our original Hindu culture and the practice still persists even among christianized Romani (in fact among many of the Western Romanichal, the group of tribes I come from, actual open-pyre cremation of the dead was still practiced until about 200 years ago when the gàdje got offended and forced us to stop!) . Though I definitely can say that the older members of my family had the same aversion to anything tainted by christianity that I do, because of the association of christianity with the deliberate destruction of our own culture.
Natalie.
July 1, 2016 at 10:25 am
Cedreacia Holley
Can you used an old deck of cards you only used once
July 2, 2016 at 12:30 pm
mkg
Cedreacia –
Of course you can use old Tarot decks. If you are talking about a deck of playing cards then you’ll have to look up meanings for fortune telling with playing cards. The meanings for playing cards are quite different than for Tarot.
Mary
August 22, 2016 at 9:41 am
Merry Chase
Just a quick heads-up that I got this heads-up from Avast: Attempts to open the link “Tarot History Information Sheet” are triggering my virus blocker.
August 24, 2016 at 5:24 pm
mkg
Merry,
Thank you for letting me know. The website no longer exists. I’ll see if I can find another source for this TarotL History Info Sheet.