What is a “transparent reading style” in tarot? I use this term to describe one element of what I do in a reading. First, it is a continuum and not an absolute. Essentially, it is including acknowledgement of where/how I’m getting information and meaning from the cards and from my interaction with the querent.
You might say it is anti-magic, except that I’m really all about magic. So I might even point out what I perceive as moments of magic. Basically, I’ll tell someone when and how their body language or something they said has clued me in to a facet of the reading. I might note that their observation about a card is contradictory to the traditional meaning and then ask them to explore how their contradiction or both are true. I might get a sense of something not in the cards and will make clear I don’t know where it is coming from. Or I will ‘trick’ someone into their personal realization and then let them know what I just did.
I find that briefly revealing my own “perception bias,” for instance a choice I naturally gravitate towards, lifestyle beliefs, or a knee-jerk reaction on my part is important. By briefly mentioning my own bias it helps me let go of that thought. It somehow relieves me of any urges that bias carries so I can be fully present to the querent’s needs and situation.
I want the client to be able to see through the wizard’s curtain (as in Oz) so that the illusion of power doesn’t stick to me, so that the querent can see me as a temporary companion on their journey and can begin to trust their own insights and volition more.
Of course I keep these transparencies minimal to not get in the way of the importance of the reading itself. And I want to keep the focus on the client and not on me.
How transparent are you in a reading? Do you assume that the cards are all-knowing? Do you assume an aura of importance to lend credence to your intuitions? Does it even help a client to pull back the curtain? Or does it make the experience less significant to a client? I admit my transparency doesn’t always work for some clients, especially those who want surety.
What do you think and do in relation to this concept? How transparent are you as a reader?

Mary K. Greer has made tarot her life work. Check here for reports of goings-on in the world of tarot and cartomancy, articles on the history and practice of tarot, and materials on other cartomancy decks. Sorry, I no longer write reviews. Contact me
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 5, 2025 at 1:53 pm
Piers Kelly
As someone who is still inexperienced at reading I find that transparency keeps me afloat and prevents me from freezing up. It’s like my internal voice with all its doubts becomes externalised: “The Queen of Swords makes me think this but now I’m wondering whether she is really indicating something else.” I also find it challenging to read for querents who are strongly committed to the ‘truth’ of the cards in a deterministic way. I see such querents as being especially vulnerable. I want to project a sense of lightness and possibility so that they can recognise their own agency. Sometimes I even enjoy seeing querents take charge of reading.
August 5, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Mary K. Greer
Piers, this is exactly what I am talking about – staying open to wonder, while still speaking your first thought. You begin to learn what is intuition and what is bias or opinion. Plus it can be empowering for querents who can also express themselves.